Ex-JAMB registrar, Prof Dibu’s trial moved to October 8 as he sacks lawyer
The Abuja Division of the Federal High Court on Wednesday adjourned the trial of the ex- registrar of Joint Admission and Matriculation Board (JAMB), Dibu Ojerinde, until October 8.
Justice Obiora Egwuatu fixed the date following Mr Ojerinde’s decision to change his counsel.
Before his decision, Peter Olorunnisola, SAN, had been appearing for the ex-JAMB boss in the money laundering charge preferred against him by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC).
The ICPC, in the suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CR/97/21, said that the former chief executive officer allegedly committed multiple frauds to the tune of N5.2 billion while heading JAMB and the National Examination Council (NECO).
Justice Egwuatu had, on July 8, admitted Mr Ojerinde to bail in the sum of N200 million with two sureties.
READ ALSO: Court grants ex-JAMB Registrar, Dibu, N200 million bail
Mr Egwuatu, who granted Ojerinde’s prayer after taking the arguments of counsel to the parties in the matter, said one of the sureties must be a professor in a federal university.
He ruled that the professor must provide documented evidence of professorship, letter of appointment and staff identity card.
He also said that the other surety must own a landed property in Abuja worth the bail sum and must be verified by the court registrar, among others.
However, when the matter was called for commencement, Itieubong Usoro, who held brief for Mr Olorunnisola, notified the court of the decision of Mr Ojerinde to disengage the present chamber from his matter.
Mr Usoro hinted that Mr Ojerinde and Mr Olorunnisola were yet to harmonise on some issues, particularly about professional fees for the former lawyer to formally withdraw from the matter.
He then sought an adjournment to enable the issues to be resolved.
The ICPC lawyer, Ebenezer Shogunle, said though the defendant was entitled to seek an adjournment, this should not be used to delay the trial.
“In the last adjourned date, the prosecution was in court with three witnesses and trial was adjourned at the instance of the defendant who complained of ill-health.
“As my lord is mindful to adjourn this matter to enable the defendant to resolve any matter he has with his counsel, we want the court to take cognisance of Section 396 of ACJA (Administration of Criminal Justice Act) which allows for day-to-day trial,” he said.
The judge, who adjourned the matter until October 8 for commencement of trial, ordered the prosecution to come to court with its witnesses.
