In Defense of Reason: Is Trump’s second coming the death of multiculturalism?, by Arch Baba Isimi (FNIA)

In Defense of Reason: Is Trump’s second coming the death of multiculturalism?, by Arch Baba Isimi (FNIA)

In recent years, the rise of conservatism, nationalism, and various forms of populism, exemplified by the second coming of Donald Trump, has sparked a heated debate about the future of multiculturalism in the West and beyond. This political shift raises fundamental questions about the viability of multiculturalism as a guiding principle in increasingly divided societies. Are we witnessing the death of multiculturalism globally, or merely a pushback against an evolving inclusiveness catalysed by technological advances and global interconnectedness?

The Context of Multiculturalism

Multiculturalism emerged as a response to the complexities of diverse societies, advocating for the recognition and celebration of cultural differences within a shared social framework. It promotes the idea that diversity enriches societies, fostering mutual respect and understanding.

However, the rise of nationalist and conservative movements signals a retreat from this ideal. Figures like Trump have championed a vision of society that prioritises national identity over multicultural integration, often framing cultural diversity as a threat rather than an asset.

READ ALSO: In Defense of Reason: A reflection on Kemi Badenoch’s leadership, by Arch Baba Isimi

Boundaries and the Evolution of Inclusiveness

At the heart of this discussion lies the concept of boundaries—both physical and ideological. Boundaries have long been artificial constructs that delineate territories, cultures, and identities. With the technological revolution—spanning telephony, the internet, and rapid transportation—these boundaries have begun to blur. Human interaction has become faster and more accessible, creating opportunities for cross-cultural exchange and collaboration that transcend geographical limitations.

This evolving inclusiveness has fostered a global community where individuals can connect based on shared interests rather than predefined cultural or national identities. The rise of social media and digital platforms has facilitated dialogues across cultures, generating a more interconnected world. Yet, this progress is met with a counter-revolution—a reactionary movement that seeks to restore traditional boundaries and reinforce a sense of belonging rooted in ethnicity, nationalism, and cultural homogeneity.

The Counter-Revolution

The counter-revolution against inclusivity is not a new phenomenon; it is as old as humanity itself. Throughout history, every stride toward progress has been met with resistance. The instinct to revert to a primordial state—characterised by self-preservation and group-centric control—often manifests in times of uncertainty. This is evident in the recent surge of populist rhetoric that romanticise a bygone era, positioning it as a golden age of cultural purity and national sovereignty.

Critics of multiculturalism argue that it undermines social cohesion, leading to fragmentation and conflict. They promote a nativistic approach, advocating for the prioritization of the interests of native populations over those of immigrants and minorities. This perspective echoes the protective impulses of early human societies, where resources were fiercely defended against outsiders. The question arises: Are we regressing to a primitive mindset, where the emphasis is placed on tribalism rather than shared humanity?

The Future of Multiculturalism

While the rise of conservatism and nationalism suggests a significant challenge to multiculturalism, it is essential to recognize the resilience of progressive ideals. History teaches us that change, though often met with resistance, is an enduring aspect of the human experience. Each generation grapples with the balance between individuality and collective identity, and the tides of history do not flow in a straight line.

The reaction against multiculturalism may indeed represent a return to a more self-centered worldview, but it is not an irreversible trend. The technological advancements that have fostered global connectivity also empower voices advocating for inclusivity and social justice. Movements for equality, environmental sustainability, and human rights continue to gain momentum, suggesting that the ideal of a shared global space, where individuals interact seamlessly irrespective of race or creed, remains a powerful aspiration.

In conclusion, while the rise of figures like Trump and the resurgence of nationalist sentiments may appear to signal the death of multiculturalism and the erasure of boundaries , it is crucial to view this phenomenon as part of a larger, ongoing struggle between progress and resistance. The human evolutionary process is marked by cycles of advancement and regression, but the overarching trajectory is one of increasing interconnectedness. As we navigate these turbulent times, the challenge remains to foster a world that embraces diversity while recognising our shared humanity. The future of multiculturalism may be uncertain, but the desire for a global community that transcends boundaries persists, driving humanity toward a more inclusive and equitable existence.

Baba Isimi, FNIA, an architect, public affairs commentator and the Lead Convener National Integration Group, writes from Abuja.

Disclaimer

The opinions and views expressed in this article belong solely to the original author and other contributors. They do not necessarily reflect the official policy or opinions of Neptune Prime.

Follow the Neptune Prime channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va74ZvU2v1IqKByXoX3d

Do you have breaking news, interview request, opinion, suggestion, or want your event covered? Email us at neptuneprime2233@gmail.com