Re: A sobering open letter to the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, by Engr. Bello Gwarzo Abdullahi, FNSE

0
328
Why the north should still be thankful to PBAT - A rejoinder, by Engr. Bello Gwarzo Abdullahi, FNSE
Engr. Bello Abdullahi Gwarzo, FNSE

Re: A sobering open letter to the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, by Engr. Bello Gwarzo Abdullahi, FNSE

In a letter titled “A Sobering Open Letter to the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,”dated 13 April 2025, Dr. A. O. Ayinde implored President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to enact a prohibition on open grazing as a strategic measure to safeguard the nation. The concerns articulated in the letter necessitate a contemplative response that contextualizes the pressing challenges at hand, thereby illustrating that a ban on open grazing, in isolation, will not rectify the underlying issues. Consequently, it is imperative to scrutinize the myriad factors contributing to the pervasive insecurity throughout the country with the objective of addressing these challenges comprehensively.

According to Dr. Ayinde, his appeal to outlaw open grazing is not rooted in animosity but rather emanates from a desire for visionary leadership that prioritizes the modernization of livestock practices in a nation characterized by a burgeoning population and limited arable land. The letter underscores that a prohibition on open grazing will not only define PBAT’s legacy but also influence the trajectory of Nigeria’s history, urging him to seize this pivotal moment to emerge as a statesman remembered for his fortitude and leadership in times of adversity.

While the issues raised resonate with the writer’s perspective on a viable path forward, certain fundamental flaws in reasoning persist: the presumption that an immediate ban on open grazing will culminate in the cessation of the insecurity crisis. This viewpoint neglects to consider the multitude of other factors intertwined with insecurity—such as the Pro-Biafra insurgency, the proliferation of firearms, and the corrupt machinations of a political elite, alongside illegal mining activities perpetrated by influential individuals, clashes between farmers and herders, Boko Haram insurgencies, robbery, kidnapping, political catastrophes, and religious upheavals. While open grazing undeniably presents security and environmental challenges, these additional issues must be addressed concurrently; otherwise, we risk merely attending to the symptoms while neglecting the root causes.

READ ALSO: Rejoinder: “The Road to 2027” and the politics of complacency, by Engr. Bello Gwarzo Abdullahi, Comrade Sanusi A. S. Maikudi

It is a well-documented fact that the prospects for sustainable livestock management hinge on a transition to more regulated systems such as ranching and feedlots, which promise enhanced livestock productivity and environmental benefits. Pastoralism, a time-honored social and economic system deeply embedded in the raising and herding of livestock, exemplifies a way of life wherein individuals are profoundly reliant on domesticated animals for their sustenance. This lifestyle often necessitates the migration of pastoralists alongside their herds in pursuit of fresh grazing pastures to sustain their livelihoods.

A primary factor contributing to insecurity within pastoralist communities is the incessant movement and displacement they endure. This continual relocation subjects them to a myriad of risks and uncertainties, complicating their ability to establish stable living conditions. Furthermore, the perennial struggle for land ownership poses a significant threat to pastoralists, as territorial conflicts can escalate into violent confrontations with dire consequences. Moreover, the ramifications of climate change further exacerbate the insecurity faced by pastoralists.

The unpredictability of weather patterns, typified by droughts and floods, disrupts the delicate equilibrium of pastoralist life. For instance, in Nigeria, pastoralist communities frequently find themselves in conflict with settled farmers over access to vital resources such as water and grazing territories. These tensions can escalate into violent clashes, further intensifying the insecurity prevalent in these regions.

Additionally, the lack of access to essential services such as education and healthcare exacerbates the challenges confronted by pastoralists, rendering them more susceptible to external threats. Insufficient infrastructure and limited resources impede their capacity to navigate emergencies or seek necessary assistance during times of need. Consequently, pastoralist communities are left contending with numerous obstacles that undermine their well-being and the sustainability of their livelihoods.

To address these multifaceted issues and ensure the resilience of pastoralism amidst prevailing insecurity, a comprehensive approach is imperative. This strategy should encompass the establishment of effective conflict resolution mechanisms to mitigate disputes, investment in sustainable land management practices to alleviate the effects of climate change, and the provision of support for pastoralists to diversify their sources of income. By implementing these strategies, pastoralist communities can adeptly navigate the challenges they face and secure a more sustainable future for their way of life.

While insecurity poses a formidable threat to pastoralism, proactive measures can be undertaken to enhance the resilience and longevity of this traditional practice. By addressing the root causes of insecurity and fostering collaboration among various stakeholders, pastoralist communities can thrive in the face of adversity. Embracing transformation while preserving the rich cultural heritage of pastoralism is essential for charting a sustainable path forward.

The implementation of initiatives such as ranching and ruga settlements, coupled with essential infrastructure development, can pave the way for the prosperity and well-being of pastoralist communities in the long run. We must always consider the root of any problem before tackling it, as addressing only the symptoms will ultimately fail to create a sustainable solution.

Therefore, prior to imposing a ban on open grazing, certain foundational elements must be established—and who better to facilitate this than the government? Let us proceed with caution; otherwise, we may inadvertently create more problems.

bgabdullahi@gmail.com

Follow the Neptune Prime channel on WhatsApp:

Do you have breaking news, interview request, opinion, suggestion, or want your event covered? Email us at neptuneprime2233@gmail.com

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here